We have collected feedback from clients from forums about the use of our antidetect in their work.
We believe that the most important thing for antidetect is the passability of accounts (so that they don’t get banned). If we can conclude from the text of the feedback on the forum that the antidetect was used for its intended purpose (multi-accounting and preventing bans because of it), then we have collected and published such feedback. Below you will see positive (green background), negative (red background) and «neutral» (yellow background) reviews. «Neutral» reviews are in quotes because they are not truly neutral reviews, but reviews that contain both positive and negative experiences with Che Browser.
It seems to be working fine. The bad thing is that only chrome. Convenient and in the settings are all clear and easy and like that, unlike the same sphere, you can use browser functions like "expect element" and put plugins for automation.
I would like to add to my review: I already have the package from bestbay.
It was in the evening, I needed something to occupy myself. Because I hadn't installed a virtual machine with Mac OS, and I didn't want to buy Sphere, so I had some time. I looked through my bookmarks and remembered about Che Browser. I activated the gift code and started using it. + Very surprised and pleased with the section with documentation + There is a telegram (although I do not welcome ) channel, which is moderated without flooding and there in fact answer questions. + I had a difficulty with working on a virtual machine and the author personally helped me to solve it + price, 30$ per month (for such money you need to buy, that's just to be ) + the product is developing and the author lives it - no. I recommend, even if you do not need, just buy to be.
I have been using it for almost a month now, it is very convenient that it saves all cookies and passwords and you can quickly switch between accounts. There was a problem with changing the password on the account, but it was quickly resolved. I wish you further development and more customers.
No customization for facebook yet, waiting. In general, the antidetect is okay. They promise, but somehow everything related to the code takes a long time to make. Apparently a lot of edits are still to come.
Good antidetect, I have been using it for about half a year. The last thing I didn't like was that the balance from the old version was not transferred to the new one. As a result, there is a small amount of money in the old version. In general, the developer actively listens to feedback, which is very pleasing.
I use this antidetect, I like it all. But I would like safari - mac configs, and I noticed such a peculiarity. When you insert luxsocks socks, start the config, it doesn't load. When you close it and start again, everything works. It's a bit strange.
I promised to write a long time ago, but I haven't. personal thanks to the support team for believing me and changing my pass, because there were some difficulties. The product itself is excellent, works very fast. in the latest version of course monetization methods are a bit surprising, but everyone earns as much as they can. success to the product.
It's a good antidetect. I made a lot of money on it... but lately I don't see much difference from anothers. Guys report on custom profiles, is there a reason to take them ? For example on amazon. I can say that there is no difference at all. I think it's purely marketing. If I'm wrong, I'm ready for a reasonable discussion.
Why so few reviews? Who thinks, thinks, ask for a test from TC, I think he will give out. We use the team, the flight is f*cking great. I really liked the function of profiles, for 1$ you can customize your work with the log. We were on a shitty sphere at one time, then switched to indigo, tested che browser, decent antic, good support, price is good, what else do you need to work. Respect.
The software has been on the market for a long time, so the trust of the seller without question, I used it myself, but my goals are not shops. There are few reviews, because on this forum users don't need such software so much, and those who do, often don't waste time on reviews.
I use the software from the beginning of its release, then amazon gave egift, now of course does not give so, but! Functions performs, if you take new chrome browsers in configs + socks or ssh not public, it works perfectly.
Very good and high quality anti-detect browser. I consider it one of the best for our work. I have been using it for a long time and I am very satisfied with it. I recommend it to everyone. Only positive emotions and impressions. Very helpful and helps. Work becomes efficient and convenient.
Im using this since 10 months now for every day and can say its, compared to its price, very effective. if your into very highly BH work then I recommend LS (with a much higher pricetag) but for usual stuff (google ads, fb, different social media etc etc) then Che is really good for its price. 5 star from me. Keep on the good work Che!
We tried not to include the following types of feedback:
although important, but not directly affecting the passability of accounts (reviews like «The support team quickly solved my technical problem, thank you» and other similar reviews).
meaningless: from people who have never used the antidetect (reviews like «At first glance, you can’t tell that the product is too amazing» and other similar reviews).
from perfectionists (reviews like «From the minuses I can note the lack of a dark theme» and other similar).
false and (or) paid with a high probability. These are frankly negative reviews from users with low reputation on the forum and (or) made almost immediately after user registration on the forum. In response to the offer to specify login in Che Browser and contact support, the user is silent and in no way develops a dialog (reviews such as «after using your antidetect got a ban, but XXX antidetect gives good passability»).
The credibility of reviews can not be doubted. For each forum we selectively made a screenshot of one of the reviews, where you can see a link to the URL of the corresponding forum (in order not to advertise third-party resources, we have hidden their URL with «*»). You can register on the forum, find a thread with Che Browser and personally verify the authenticity of the review published by us by checking its text, date of publication and username.
When analyzing a review, we recommend paying attention to the following review parameters:
user reputation/reactions. The higher (more), the better. Reputation can be negative (-4, for example; usually such users are soon banned), positive (e.g. +2) or neutral (0). If you see a review of a person with a negative reputation, then most likely you are dealing with an inadequate or a scammer who has not yet been banned from the forum for some reason. Some forums have «reactions» instead of «reputation». In this case, the value cannot be negative. The more reactions, the better (the more «authoritative» the user is). Sometimes BL (business level) is used: the more it is, the better.
date of user registration on the forum and date of feedback. The more time passed from the date of registration to the date of review, the better. It is desirable that the period from the date of user registration to the date of review should be more than one month. It is suspicious when the registration date and review date are the same and the reputation/reactions are 0 (zero) or negative.